Submit your site


   Login
 
 
Forum Rules
  • Please refer to the Forum Rules Amended section for additional rules and modifications.
  • This is a moderated forum, all posts will be checked for bad language and composition.
  • Before you post in the information section, make sure the information you add is fully accurate.
  • All posts within the local and national policy sections must be factually correct and substantively debatable.
  • Feel free to be provocative or even politically incorrect, within the rules set.
  • No threats, sexual or racist remarks of any nature will be tolerated. Any posts that violate these common sense rules will be removed. Your account may also be suspended after so many violations.
  • Creating multiple accounts and pretending to be someone else will result in instant termination of all accounts. We check up on all accounts / IP addresses frequently. You must register and login in order to post within the forums. Your information will not be given out or sold for mailing lists.
Subject: George Orwell Lives! In Cananda
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author Messages
Gunrights
Posts:674
Senior User
Senior User
Online Status:User is Offline
Intergalactic Multi Phase Dementsion

02/14/2008 9:07 AM  

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/pageId=56284

Thursday, February 14, 2008


NO APOLOGIES
The thugs on the Commie Commissions
Exclusive: Tristan Emmanuel blasts prime minister for refusing to defend free speech


Posted: February 14, 2008
12:45 am Eastern


By Tristan Emmanuel


I say again I don't know who wrote these empty talking points, or when. But when every medium in the country, from the Globe and Mail to the Toronto Star to the National Post, are united in calling for an amendment of section 13, surely a little bit of political courage can be expected from a government calling itself Conservative. – Ezra Levant

We are in the fight for our lives in Canada these days on the issue of "freedom of speech." I have previously written about Canada's "Human Rights Commissions" and their attempts to shut down free speech in Canada, especially speech that runs counter to accepted liberal dogma. As a follow up to that last column, it's worth noting that while the specific charges I wrote about there against FreeDominion.ca – Canada's largest online conservative political forum – were ultimately dropped, the owners of the site decided late last year to sell the whole thing to a company in Panama, a company which describes its corporate mission as "buying websites from individuals and corporations living in countries where free speech is under attack, and protecting those websites from being shut down or seized by oppressive governments." Yes, it's come to that in Canada.

And now there are more cases of attempted suppression of free speech. The latest ones involve conservative columnist Mark Steyn and MacLean's magazine – kind of a Canadian version of Time or Newsweek – and a man named Ezra Levant.

Maclean's reprinted a chapter out of Steyn's book "America Alone" more than a year ago, a chapter detailing the growth of Muslim demographics in Europe and what that growth could mean to Western society. Some Muslims claim they were offended by the article and are hauling Maclean's and Mark Steyn before two of these Commie Commissions.

<form>>

</form>

As to Ezra Levant, he used to publish a newsmagazine in Calgary; it was the only Canadian news outlet with the courage to reprint the so-called "Danish cartoons" two years ago. Like Steyn, he is being hauled before one of these I'm-Offended Commissions to answer for his political incorrectness. There is, incidentally, some amazing videos of his questioning at YouTube. Just search on "Ezra Levant" and get ready to stand and cheer at the way he defends the principles of free speech and a free press.

 

Those videos have been viewed close to half a million times since they were posted a month ago, and because of the resultant publicity, one of the complainants in the case is now backing away. That publicity has also forced the Canadian government actually to acknowledge that this is becoming an issue. Earlier this week, the news division of the ECP Centre, noapologies.ca, broke a story on exactly what the government plans to do. Our news editor obtained a leaked copy of a "talking points" document that was being circulated to government members of Parliament. The document, essentially, says the government plans to lie low, say nothing and hope this all goes away.

It was that document that Levant was referring to in the opening quote of this column. And I worry that he is desperately wrong in his hope that "a little bit of political courage can be expected from a government calling itself Conservative."

Ezra himself is a courageous man. Watch the videos at YouTube if you don't believe me.

But I don't hold out much hope for "courage" from Canada's prime minister, either on this or on any other issue. The fact is Canadian politicians don't generally act on issues of real importance until they are shamed into doing something.

And I include the prime minister, Stephen Harper, in that assessment. I've never been a fan of Harper's. Yes, he's done a few good things, and yes, he's a lot better than the Liberals. But that's essentially the same Hobson's choice that says John McCain is better than Hillary Clinton. I really don't think it's that big a deal when someone who claims to be a Conservative actually behaves a little bit less like a liberal than a full-blown Liberal.

But in Canada, conservatives seem unwilling to raise the bar of expectation. And when Ezra Levant writes that "surely a little bit of courage can be expected," he is articulating the sorry state of Canadian politics in crystal clear terms.

I'm no political operative, but I would respectfully say to Ezra that at this late stage in the game, "courage" has nothing to do with any of this.

The time for Stephen Harper to have shown "courage" on this issue came and went years ago. He could have shown courage by coming to the defense of teacher Chris Kempling who was (and continues to be) maliciously vilified and persecuted by his professional association – the B.C. College of Teachers – for writing a letter to the editor in defense of traditional marriage. But Harper said nothing.

Harper could have spoken out for other Canadians similarly accused and persecuted; people such as Hugh Owens, Scott Brockie and Steven Boissoin, all of whom have suffered myriad injustices at the hands of the Gestapo-like tactics of the "Human Rights" thugs for daring to stand for traditional values, and for giving voice to what amount to politically incorrect ideas.

Instead, Stephen Harper has said and done exactly nothing. And the "talking points" that were circulated to his members of Parliament this week advocate a continuation of this non-action.

The time for Harper to show real courage as a stalwart defender of free-speech values has come and gone.

Last month, a Liberal member of Parliament introduced a motion that would deal with some of the more egregiously fascist aspects of the Human Rights Act. And now, a coterie of columnists and commentators has jumped on board the bandwagon, to the point where "free speech" may actually become trendy again.

So let's be clear about something. If Stephen Harper actually does speak out in favor of the right to speak out at this late stage of the game, he'll simply be showing that he is the consummate politician who won't say or do anything unless it is safe. He certainly won't be showing "courage." It's way too late for that.

[script removed] [script removed]  

You are not authorized to post a reply.
Forums > Local Personal Posts > A CALL TO ACTION! > George Orwell Lives! In Cananda



ActiveForums 3.7
Sponsors
Advertise Here - 120x120
United Computer Service, Networking, Computer Repair, Virus Removal, Data Recovery