Submit your site


   Login
 
 
Forum Rules
  • Please refer to the Forum Rules Amended section for additional rules and modifications.
  • This is a moderated forum, all posts will be checked for bad language and composition.
  • Before you post in the information section, make sure the information you add is fully accurate.
  • All posts within the local and national policy sections must be factually correct and substantively debatable.
  • Feel free to be provocative or even politically incorrect, within the rules set.
  • No threats, sexual or racist remarks of any nature will be tolerated. Any posts that violate these common sense rules will be removed. Your account may also be suspended after so many violations.
  • Creating multiple accounts and pretending to be someone else will result in instant termination of all accounts. We check up on all accounts / IP addresses frequently. You must register and login in order to post within the forums. Your information will not be given out or sold for mailing lists.
Subject: Iran Intent on Obtaining Nukes
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author Messages
Gunrights
Posts:674
Senior User
Senior User
Online Status:User is Offline
Intergalactic Multi Phase Dementsion

04/25/2008 9:41 PM  

Newsmax.com


Gates: Iran Hell Bent on Getting Nukes

Monday, April 21, 2008 10:32 PM


 

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he believes Iran is "hell bent" on acquiring nuclear weapons, but he warned in strong terms of the consequences of going to war over that.

 

"Another war in the Middle East is the last thing we need and, in fact, I believe it would be disastrous on a number of levels," he said in a speech he was delivering Monday evening at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y.

 

A copy of his prepared remarks was provided in advance by the Pentagon.

 

He said he favors keeping the military option against Iran on the table, "given the destabilizing policies of the regime and the risks inherent in a future Iranian nuclear threat — either directly or through proliferation."

 

Gates also said that if the war in Iraq is not finished on favorable terms the consequences could be dire.

 

"It is a hard sell to say we must sustain the fight in Iraq right now, and continue to absorb the high financial and human costs of this struggle, in order to avoid an even uglier fight or even greater danger to our country in the future," he said.

 

But he added that the U.S. experience with Afghanistan — helping the Afghans oust Russian invaders in the 1980s only to abandon the country and see it become a haven for Osama bin Laden's terrorist network — makes it clear to him that a similar approach in Iraq would have similar results.

Gates said the U.S. military was not organized and equipped for the kind of wars it finds itself in today.

 

"The current campaign has gone on longer, and has been more difficult, than anyone expected or prepared for at the start," he said. "And so we've had to scramble to position ourselves for success over the long haul, which I believe we are doing."

 

He called a drawdown of U.S. forces in Iraq "inevitable," with the debate mainly over timing.

 

"But the kind of enemy we face today — violent jihadist networks — will not allow us to remain at peace," he said. "What has been called the `long war' is likely to be many years of persistent, engaged combat all around the world in differing degrees of size and intensity. This generational challenge cannot be wished away or put on a timetable. There are no exit strategies."

© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

You are not authorized to post a reply.
Forums > Local Personal Posts > A CALL TO ACTION! > Iran Intent on Obtaining Nukes



ActiveForums 3.7
Sponsors
Advertise Here - 120x120
United Computer Service, Networking, Computer Repair, Virus Removal, Data Recovery